What is a family newspaper to do when the most important research coming out of the big, flashy medical center down the street involves .... repairs to the male anatomy? The story Tuesday about research at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine involving the laboratory growth of erectile penile tissue, or EPT, is one of those text-book examples of the fine lines newspapers have to balance. It was the lead story on Wired.com that day as well ...
One email we received spoke for others and took issue with our decision to put this story on the front page. The writer wrote: today’s “front page news” about rabbits and the repair of their little malfunctioning penises really sets the bar even lower. In a world this large and complex that is the best thing you could come up with for the front page? Think again. A significant advance in the treatment of cancer or AIDS - okay - this article - I don’t think so.
We struggled a bit in our discussions about how to present this story. It’s clearly a front-page story. It’s research from here that is groundbreaking and has the potential to impact thousands of lives. If it were about the ability to grow heart valve tissue, there would be no discussion. It only comes into play because the research is related to ... sex.
From my perspective, to bury the story because we don’t want something sexually related on the front page is a disservice to the research. The better tactic is to not be ashamed of it, but to be discreet in the use of graphics, to watch the bad headlines and be upfront that this is research and it’s related to that most intimate of ailments.
Your host is Ken Otterbourg, the managing editor at the Winston-Salem Journal. It's a forum to discuss the media, from
Post a comment